Hugo Quené — publications and manuscripts

profiles

Utrecht University | ORCID | ResearchGate | academia.edu | Google Scholar | GitHub | LinkedIn | OSF | Web of Science |

selected publications

• Quené, H. & Nooteboom, S.G. (2024). Some properties of mental speech preparation as revealed by self-monitoring. Speech Communication, 103043. [doi:10.1016/j.specom.2024.103043]
• Quené, H. & Nooteboom, S.G. (2024). Some properties of mental speech preparation as revealed by self-monitoring: Supplementary Materials. [data and software: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/79YNW], [pdf document: 1-s2.0-S0167639324000153-mmc1.pdf].
• Pinget, A.-F. & Quené, H. (2023). Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel fundamental frequency in Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154 (4), 2124-2136. [doi:10.1121/10.0021070].
• Quené, H. & Pinget, A.-F. (2023). Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel fundamental frequency in Dutch: Supplementary Materials (Utrecht University, version 1.0) [data and software]. [doi:10.24416/UU01-YLFQFF].
• Nooteboom, S.G., & Quené, H. (2023). Corrigendum to 'Parallels between self-monitoring for speech errors and identification of the misspoken segments' [J. Mem. Lang. 69(3) (2013) 417-428]. Journal of Memory and Language, 132, 104448. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2023.104448].
• Hu, N., Chen, A., Quené, H. & Sanders, T.J.M. (2023). The role of prosody in interpreting causality in English discourse. PLoS ONE, 18(6), e0286003 (22 pages). [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286003]. Supplementary materials available at https://osf.io/g8e6x.
• de Boer, M.M., Quené, H. & Heeren, W.F.L. (2022). Long-term within-speaker consistency of filled pauses in native and non-native speech. JASA Express Letters, 2, 035201 (6 pages). [doi:10.1121/10.0009598].
• Ditewig, S., Smorenburg, L., Quené, H. & Heeren, W. (2021). S-retraction in Moroccan Dutch and endogenous Dutch. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 26(3), 315-338. [doi:10.5117/NEDTAA2021.3.001.DITE].
• Quené, H., Pierazzo, E., Ciotti, F., & Vanhoutte, E. (2021). Introduction. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36, Supplement 2 (special issue 'Digital Humanities 2019: Complexities'), ii1. [doi:10.1093/llc/fqab059].
• Quené, H. & Van den Bergh, H. (2021). Quantitative Methods and Statistics. Open textbook, available at https://hugoquene.github.io/QMS-EN, 290+ pp. [Multiple formats, source code, and supplementary materials are available at doi:10.5281/zenodo.4479620].
• Quené, H. & Van den Bergh, H. (2021). Kwantitatieve Methoden en Statistiek [in Dutch]. Open textbook, available at https://hugoquene.github.io/KMS-NL, 290+ pp. [Multiple formats, source code, and supplementary materials are available at doi:10.5281/zenodo.4113979].
• H. Quené, G. Boomsma & R. van Erning (2021). Attractiveness of male speakers: effects of pitch and tempo. In: B. Weiss, J. Trouvain, M. Barkat-Defradas, J.J. Ohala, (Eds), Voice Attractiveness: Studies on sexy, likeable and charismatic speakers (pp.153-164). Singapore: Springer. [doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6627-1_9].
• Quené, H. (2020). Statistics with R. Tutorial materials presented at the Workshop on Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research (EMLAR), 17 April 2020. [booklet https://hugoquene.github.io/emlar2020, open materials doi:10411/ZYWMPQ].
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2020). Repairing speech errors: Competition as a source of repairs. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104069. [doi:10.1016/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104069; data, analyses, and supplementary materials].
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2019). Temporal aspects of self-monitoring for speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 43-59. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.11.002].
• R. van den Doel, A.-F. Pinget & H. Quené (2018). Non-native attitudes to /θ/ and /ð/: a European case study. Research in Language, 16 (4), 407-427. [doi:10.2478/rela-2018-0020].
• Orr, R. & Quené, H. (2017). D-LUCEA: Curation of of the UCU Accent Project data. In: J. Odijk & A. van Hessen (Eds.), CLARIN in the Low Countries (pp. 181-193). London: Ubiquity. [doi:10.5334/bbi.15].
• Quené, H., Orr, R. & van Leeuwen, D. (2017). Phonetic similarity of /s/ in native and second language: individual differences in learning curves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142 (6), EL519-EL524. [doi:10.1121/1.5013149, PDF].
  Copyright 2017 Acoustical Society of America. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the Acoustical Society of America.
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2017). Self-monitoring for speech errors: Two-stage detection and repair with and without auditory feedback. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 19-35. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.007]
• Quené, H. (2017). De kansen van spreiding [in Dutch]. Inaugural lecture, Utrecht University, 13 March 2017. [pdf]
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2015). Word onsets and speech errors. Explaining relative frequencies of segmental substitutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 33-46. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.10.001]
• Nooteboom, S. & Quené, H. (2014). Do speakers try to distract attention from their speech errors? The prosody of self-repairs. In: J. Caspers, Y. Chen, W. Heeren, J. Pacilly, N.O. Schiller & E. van Zanten (eds.) Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics (pp.203-217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [doi:10.1075/z.189.17noo]
• Bosker, H.R., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N.H. (2014). The perception of native and non-native fluency. Language Learning, 64 (3), 579-614. [doi:10.1111/lang.12067]
• Quené, H. (2014). Longitudinal trends in pause distributions in spoken text. In: R. Kager, J. Grijzenhout & K. Sebregts (eds.) Where the Principles Fail: A Festschrift for Wim Zonneveld on the occasion of his 64th birthday (p.185-192). Utrecht: UiL OTS.
• Bosker, H.R., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N.H. (2014). Native 'um's elicit prediction of low-frequency referents, but non-native 'um's do not. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 104-116. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.004]
• Pinget, A.-F., Bosker, H.R., Quené, H. & and De Jong, N.H. (2014). Native speakers' perceptions of fluency and accent in L2 speech. Language Testing, 31 (3), 349-365. [doi:10.1177/0265532214526177]
• Ferguson, S.H. & Quené, H. (2014). Acoustic correlates of vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135 (6), 3570-3584. [doi:10.1121/1.4874596, PMCID:PMC4048446]
• S.G. Nooteboom & H. Quené (2013b). Parallels between self-monitoring for speech errors and identification of the misspoken segments. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (3), 417–428. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.006, Corrigendum (2023): doi:10.1016/j.jml.2023.104448].
• H. Quené (2013). Longitudinal trends in speech tempo: The case of Queen Beatrix. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133 (6), EL452-EL457. [doi:10.1121/1.4802892]
  Copyright 2013 Acoustical Society of America. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the Acoustical Society of America.
  [Supplementary: doi:10.5281/zenodo.7288541]
• H.R. Bosker, A.-F. Pinget, H. Quené, T. Sanders & N.H. de Jong (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30 (2), 159-175. [doi:10.1177/0265532212455394]
• R. van den Doel & H. Quené (2013). The endonormative standards of European English: Emerging or elusive? English World-wide, 34 (1), 77-98. [doi:10.1075/eww.34.1.04van]
• S.G. Nooteboom & H. Quené (2013a). Heft lemisphere: Exchanges predominate in segmental speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (1), 26-38. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.08.004]
• H. Quené, G.R. Semin & F. Foroni (2012). Audible smiles and frowns affect speech comprehension. Speech Communication, 54 (7), 917–922. [doi:10.1016/j.specom.2012.03.004, preprint]
• W. Zonneveld, H. Quené & W. Heeren, eds. (2011). Sound and Sounds: Studies presented to M.E.H. (Bert) Schouten on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Utrecht: UiL OTS.
• Ph. Dejonckere, H. Quené, J. Smit, M. Duijnstee, F. Wijnen & E. Gerrits (2011). De Utrechtse opleidingskolom Logopedie. Logopedie en Foniatrie 83 (1), 18-22.
• I. Persoon, T.J.M. Sanders, H. Quené & A. Verhagen (2010). Een coördinerende omdat-constructie in gesproken Nederlands? Tekstlinguïstische en prosodische aspecten. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 15 (3), 259-282.
• H. Quené & L.E. van Delft (2010). Non-native durational patterns decrease speech intelligibility. Speech Communication, 52 (11-12), 911-918. [doi:10.1016/j.specom.2010.03.005, preprint]
• H. Quené (2010). How to design and analyze language acquisition studies. In: E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.) Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research (pp.269-284). Amsterdam: Benjamins. ISBN 978-90-272-1997-8. [preprint].
  "... an astute discussion of the importance of study design and analysis for purposes not only of validity but also of sound research ethics" (Bigelow & Kong, 2013, review in Mod Lang J, 97(1), 289-290).
• M.J. de Bruijn, L. ten Bosch, D.J. Kuik, H. Quené, J.A. Langendijk, C.R. Leemans & I.M. Verdonck-de Leeuw (2009). Objective acoustic-phonetic speech analysis in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 61 (3), 180-187. [doi:10.1159/000219953].
• M. Schreuder, D. Gilbers & H. Quené (2009). Recursion in phonology. Lingua, 119, 1243-1252. [doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.007].
• H. Quené (2008). Andante of allegro? Verschillen in spreektempo tussen Vlamingen en Nederlanders [in Dutch]. Onze Taal, 77 (6), 179-181. [PDF].
• H. Quené & H. van den Bergh (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413-425. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002, preprint, supporting materials]
• M.A. van Rossum, H. Quené & S.G. Nooteboom (2008). Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22 (3), 215-231. [doi:10.1080/02699200701847160].
• S.G. Nooteboom & H. Quené (2008). Self-monitoring and feedback: a new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 (3), 837-861. [doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.003, preprint].
• H. Quené (2008). Multilevel modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123 (2), 1104-1113. [doi:10.1121/1.2821762, pdf].
• S.G. Nooteboom & H. Quené (2007). The SLIP technique as a window on the mental preparation of speech: Some methodological considerations. In: M.-J. Solé, P. Speeter Beddor & M. Ohala (Eds.) Experimental Approaches to Phonology (pp.339-350). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-929667-5. [preprint].
• H. Quené (2007). On the just noticeable difference for tempo in speech. Journal of Phonetics, 35 (3), 353-362. [doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2006.09.001, preprint].
• E. Janse, S.G. Nooteboom & H. Quené (2007). Coping with gradient forms of /t/-deletion and lexical ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22 (2), 161-200. [doi:10.1080/01690960500371024, pdf].
• P.M. van Nieuwenhuijsen & H. Quené (2005). Spraakklanken en regels. In: P.M. van Nieuwenhuijsen et al., Het verschijnsel taal: Een kennismaking (tweede, herziene druk; pp.22-36). Bussum: Coutinho.
• H. Quené & R.F. Port (2005). Effects of timing regularity and metrical expectancy on spoken-word perception. Phonetica 62 (1), 1-13. [doi:10.1159/000087222, preprint]. [20201013: added supplementary materials]
• H. Quené & V.J. van Heuven, eds. (2004). On Speech and Language: Studies for Sieb G. Nooteboom. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. LOT Occasional Series; 2. ISBN 90-76864-53-5. [complete book]
• E. Janse & H. Quené (2004). On measuring multiple lexical activation using the cross-modal semantic priming technique. In: H. Quené & V.J. van Heuven (eds.) On Speech and Language: Studies for Sieb G. Nooteboom (pp.105-115). Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. LOT Occasional Series; 2. ISBN 90-76864-53-5. [complete book, unpublished longer manuscript].
• H. Quené & H. van den Bergh (2004). On Multi-Level Modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43 (1-2), 103-121. [doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.02.004, preprint, supporting materials].
• E. Janse, S. Nooteboom & H. Quené (2003). Word-level intelligibility of time-compressed speech: Prosodic and segmental factors. Speech Communication, 41 (2-3), 287-301. [doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00130-9].
• H. Quené & R.F. Port (2002). Rhythmical factors in stress shift. In: M. Andronis, E. Debenport, A. Pycha & K. Yoshimura (eds.) CLS 38: Papers from the 38th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Volume 1: The Main Session; pp.549-562). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Also in: Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics, 02-18A. [preprint].
• J.B. Cohan, H. Quené, R.W.J. Kager & S.G. Nooteboom (2002). Heavy constraint extraposition: Evidence for parallel processing. In: M. Hirotani (ed.) NELS 32: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
• M.A. van Rossum, G. de Krom, S.G. Nooteboom & H. Quené (2002). "Pitch" accent in alaryngeal speech. J. Language Speech and Hearing Research 45, 1106-1118. [pdf].
• H. Quené & M.L. Koster (1998). Metrical segmentation in Dutch: vowel quality or stress? Language and Speech 41 (2), 185-202.
• A. Dirksen & H. Quené (1993). Prosodic Analysis: the next generation. In: V.J. van Heuven & L.C.W. Pols (eds.), Analysis and Synthesis of Speech: strategic research towards high-quality text-to-speech generation (pp.pp.131-144). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Speech Research; 11. .
• H. Quené (1993). Segment durations and accent as cues to word segmentation in Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94 (4), 2027-2035. [doi:10.1121/1.407504].
• H. Quené (1992). Integration of acoustic-phonetic cues in word segmentation. In: M.E.H. Schouten (ed.), The Auditory Processing of Speech: from sounds to words (pp. 349-356). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Speech Research; 10.
• H. Quené & R. Kager (1992). The derivation of prosody for text-to-speech from prosodic sentence structure. Computer Speech and Language 6 (1), 77-98. [postprint].
• H. Quené (1992). Durational cues for word segmentation in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 20 (3), 331-350. [pdf].

in progress

selected conference papers

• Quené, H. & Nooteboom, S.G. (2023). Self-monitoring of speech errors: Effects of phonetic contrast. In: Radek Skarnitzl & Jan Volín (Eds.), Proc. 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 4028–4032). Guarant International. PDF.
• Sebregts, K., Vriesendorp, H., Quené, H. & White, Yosiane (2023). Creaky voice in L2 English and L1 Dutch. In: Radek Skarnitzl & Jan Volín (Eds.), Proc. 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1841-1845). Guarant International. PDF.
• Van den Berg, M., Smorenburg, L., Branje, S., Quené, H., & Chen, A. (2023). Prosodic entrainment in mother-adolescent interaction and relationship quality. Phonetics and Phonology in Europe, Nijmegen, 2-4 June 2023.
• Hu, N., Chen, A., Li, F., Quené, H., & Sanders, T. (2022). A trade-off relationship between lexical and prosodic means in expressing subjective and objective causality. In: Proc. Speech Prosody 2022, Lisbon (pp.22-26) [doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-5] PDF.
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2021). Why are some speech errors detected by self-monitoring "early" and others "late"? In: R.L. Rose & R. Eklund (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS 2021), Université Paris VIII, 25-26 Aug (pp. 11-16). [preprint]
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2019). Testing a theory of repairing segmental speech errors. In: Proc. 19th ICPhS, Melbourne, 2019. PDF.
• Nooteboom, S. & Quené, H. (2017). The time course of self-monitoring within words and utterances. In: Proc. 8th DiSS workshop, Stockholm, 2017 (pp.45-48). PDF.
• Quené, H., Boomsma, G., & van Erning, R. (2016). Attractiveness of male speakers: Effects of voice pitch and of speech tempo. In: Proc. Speech Prosody 2016, Boston (pp.1086-1089) [doi: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-223]. PDF.
• Barthel, H. & Quené, H. (2015). Acoustic-phonetic properties of smiling revised: Measurements on a natural video corpus. In: Proc. 18th ICPhS, Glasgow, 2015. PDF.
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2015). Word-onsets and stress patterns: speech errors in a tongue-twister experiment. In: Proc. 18th ICPhS, Glasgow, 2015. PDF.
• Quené, H., & Orr, R. (2014). Long-term convergence of speech rhythm in L1 and L2 English. In: Proc. Speech Prosody 2014, Dublin (pp.342-345) [doi: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-56] PDF.
• Nooteboom, S., & Quené, H. (2013). Self-monitoring as reflected in identification of misspoken segments. In: Proc. 7th DiSS workshop, Stockholm, 2013 (pp.55-57). PDF.
• Quené, H., & Schuerman, W. (2012). Smile with a smile. In: Proc. Interspeech 2012, Portland (pp.603-606) [doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2012-183]. PDF.
• Orr, R., Quené, H., Beek, R. van, Diefenbach, T., Leeuwen, D.A. van, & Huijbregts, M. (2011). An international English speech corpus for longitudinal study of accent development. In: Proc. Interspeech 2011, Florence (pp.1889-1892) [doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2011-513]. PDF.
• Ouden, H. den & Quené, H. (2009). Effects of tempo in radio commercials on young and elderly listeners. In: Proc. Interspeech 2009, Brighton (pp.816-819) [doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2009-61]. PDF.
• Bruijn, M. de, Verdonck-deLeeuw, I., Bosch, L. ten, Kuik, J., Quene, H., Boves, L., Langendijk, H., Leemans, R. (2008). Phonetic-acoustic and feature analyses by a neural network to assess speech quality in patients treated for head and neck cancer. In: Proc. Interspeech 2008, Brisbane (pp.1753-1756) [doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2008-483]. PDF.
• Janse, E., Van der Werff, M. & Quené, H. (2007). Listening to fast speech: Aging and sentence context. In: Proc. 16th ICPhS, Saarbrücken, 2007 (pp.681-684). PDF.
• Nooteboom, S.G. & Quené, H. (2007). Strategies for editing out speech errors in inner speech. In: Proc. 16th ICPhS, Saarbrücken, 2007 (pp.1945-1948). PDF.
• Quené, H. (2006). Rhythmic factors in weak-syllable insertion: an internet corpus study. In: Proc. Speech Prosody 2006, Dresden (paper 068). PDF.
• Quené, H. (2005). Modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo. Proc. Interspeech 2005, Lisbon (pp.2457-2460) [doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2005-754]. PDF.
• Quené, H. & Port, R.F. (2003). Produced speech rhythm depends on predictability of stress patterns. In: Proc. 15th ICPhS, Barcelona, 2003 (pp.2445-2448). PDF.
• Quené, H. & Krull, J. (1999). Recognition of assimilated words in normal and fast speech. In: Proc. 14th ICPhS, San Francisco, 1999 (pp.1831-1834). PDF.
• Janse, E. & Quené, H. (1999). On the suitability of the cross-modal semantic priming task. In: Proc. 14th ICPhS, San Francisco, 1999 (pp.1937-1940). PDF.
• Quené, H., Rossum, M. van, Wijck, M. van (1998). Assimilation and anticipation in word perception. In: Proc. 5th ICSLP, Sydney, 1998, paper 0113. PDF.
• Riele, S. te, Quené, H. (1998). Evidence for early effects of sentence context on word segmentation. In: Proc. 5th ICSLP, Sydney, 1998, paper 0326. PDF.
• Riele, S. te, Nooteboom, S.G., & Quené, H. (1996). Strategies used in rhyme-monitoring. In: Proc. 4th ICSLP, Philadelphia, 1996 (pp.90-93). PDF.
• Quene, H., & Smits, Y. (1992). On the absence of word segmentation at "weak" syllables. In: Proc. 2nd ICSLP, Banff, 1992 (pp.213-216). PDF.
• Quené, H. (1991). Word segmentation in meaningful and nonsense speech. In: Proc. 12th ICPhS, Aix-en-Provence, 1991 (vol.5, pp.82-85). PDF.
• Quené, H., & Dirksen, A. (1990). A comparison of natural, theoretical and automatically derived accentuations of Dutch texts. Proc. 1st ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis (SSW 1), Autrans, 1990 (pp.137-140). PDF.
• Quené, H. & Kager, R. (1989). Automatic accentuation and prosodic phrasing for Dutch text-to-speech conversion. In: Proc. 1st EuroSpeech, Paris, 1989 (p.1214-1218). PDF.
• Kager, R. & Quene, H. (1987). Deriving prosodic sentence structure without exhaustive syntactic analysis. In: Proc. European Conference on Speech Technology, Edinburgh, 1987 (pp.1243-1246). PDF.
• Quené, H. (1987). Perceptual relevance of acoustical word boundary markers. In: Proc. 11th ICPhS, Tallin, 1987 (vol.6, pp.79-82). PDF.

other works

• Quené, H. (2022). Tempo: revised script for measuring speech tempo (speaking rate) in Praat (after De Jong & Wempe, 2009). Available at https://github.com/hugoquene/tempo [doi:10.5281/zenodo.7288542].
• Quené, H. (2021). Quantitative Research Cheat Sheet. Available at https://www.hugoquene.nl/qm/CheatSheetQuantRes.pdf [doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.11392.15365].
• Quené, H. (2014). Spaties. Trouw, 14 april 2014. Republished in: Flip van Doorn & Jonah Kahn, red. (2019), Hoeveel poten heeft een octopus? Het grote boek van de nutteloze kennis (p.303). Amsterdam: Thomas Rap. [ISBN 978-94-004-0418-2]
• Quené, H. (2014/2022). hqmisc: Miscellaneous convenience functions and dataset. R package version 0.2-1 https://cran.r-project.org/package=hqmisc .
• "Statenbijbel" (1637/2008, N. van der Sijs, ed.). Transcription of pp. 31R to 37R (Ev. Lucae 7:10 to 15:4).
• Welker, C. & Quené, H. (2007). Basics of phonetics, and how to use Praat: Tutorial for self-study. https://resources.lab.hum.uu.nl/resources/phonetics/index.html
• Quené, H. (2005/2020). Rhythmic regularity, Experiment 4, NL version [data and software]. (Utrecht University, version Jan 2005). [doi:10.24416/UU01-N8Q1RO]
  This package contains supplementary materials accompanying Quené & Port (2005) [doi:10.1159/000087222] listed above.
• H. Quené (2003). Letterendocent overbelast. U-Blad [Utrechts Universiteitsblad] 34 (33), 8 mei 2003, p.8 [in Dutch, image; preprint].
• H. Quené (1999). Geluidsbestanden Fonetiek [Audio demonstrations in Phonetics]. CD-ROM and website [http://audiufon.hum.uu.nl/].